Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Curry County board upholds RV-park approval and orders partial refund of appeal costs
Summary
The Curry County Board of Commissioners on Nov. 12, 2025 upheld approval of file AD-24-31 — a request to develop an RV park — and ordered a refund of half the appeal costs to the appellants; the motion passed 2-0 with one abstention recorded.
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Curry County Board of Commissioners on Nov. 12, 2025 voted to uphold approval of file AD-24-31, a request to develop an RV park, and directed a refund of half the appeal costs to the individuals who filed the appeal.
Unidentified Speaker 2 moved to "uphold the approval of file a d dash 24 31 a request for the development of an RV park with the conditions of approval as outlined in the Board of Commissioners final order and also a refund of half of the appeal costs back to the individuals who provided the appeal." The motion received a second and was put to a roll call vote. Commissioner Coker voted "Aye" and Commissioner Trost voted "Aye." The transcript records the vote as passing 2 to 0 with one abstention; the recording of Commissioner Hollinger's response is unclear in the transcript.
The meeting also included discussion about land-use policy review. Unidentified Speaker 2 said they had researched the matter and noted some applications had been filed under previous rules, which limited the board's ability to apply newly adopted land-use changes retroactively. They urged the board to adopt a policy of reviewing land-use planning materials on a five-year schedule to maintain clarity and accessibility for property owners, saying, "We should have a policy that we review those on a 5 year schedule at minimum."
Unidentified Speaker 3 thanked staff for distributing materials over the weekend, saying that the documentation "looked very thorough" and helped members move forward. After the vote, speakers praised the collegial tone: "it was laden with mutual respect," Unidentified Speaker 3 said, and expressed interest in continuing work on aspects of the project despite remaining uncertainties.
The board adjourned following the vote. The transcript identifies the motion topic as file AD-24-31 and references the "Board of Commissioners final order" as the controlling document; additional procedural details such as who seconded the motion and the precise identity of the abstaining commissioner were not clearly captured in the available transcript.

