Commissioners debate operational audit costs and scope, opt for phased approach
Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts
Subscribe
Summary
After revisiting a previously proposed comprehensive operational audit, commissioners discussed its high estimated cost (~$50,000), vendor availability, and whether to phase studies by department; staff was asked to solicit quotes for a narrower Public Works audit and return with scopes and budgets.
Commissioners reopened discussion of a previously proposed operational audit and debated scope, cost and implementation. The board recalled prior work done by Justice Planners related to jail operations and noted the full organizational study previously considered could cost in the tens of thousands.
Tammy Robinson, finance director, told commissioners that earlier quotes had been near $50,000 and outlined possible funding sources, including CIP funds or consulting-service budgets. Commissioners raised two recurring concerns: whether an external consultant could produce recommendations the county could actually implement and whether a phased approach (starting with Public Works or a single building) would be more practical than a single, large contract.
Tammy said the sheriff’s office carryover has fallen as positions were filled and suggested targeted scopes would reduce cost. Commissioners asked staff to solicit quotes for department-specific audits, to define scopes (fleet management, staffing, equipment leasing vs. purchase), and to return with written proposals and cost estimates. Several members emphasized that internal process changes and department-led efficiency measures should be evaluated before hiring an outside consultant.
No formal motion to hire an auditor was approved; the matter was placed on unfinished business and will return with more detailed scope and cost information for board consideration.