Laramie City Council approves landfill design, tank repairs and consent items in unanimous votes

Laramie City Council · December 4, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At its Dec. 2 meeting the Laramie City Council unanimously approved a professional services agreement with Trihydro Corporation to design new landfill cells and a contract with Great Plains Structures LLC to replace a Zone 4 tank dome, along with a 9–0 consent agenda.

The Laramie City Council unanimously approved several infrastructure contracts and routine consent items during its Dec. 2, 2025 meeting.

In the most significant actions, council members voted 9–0 to approve a professional services agreement with Trihydro Corporation to design four landfill cells, a leach pond and a redesign of the landfill front office. The council also approved a budget amendment and awarded a contract to Great Plains Structures LLC to replace the dome on the Zone 4 tank and carry out preventative maintenance around the tank base to repair cracks and bolster structural integrity; that measure also passed 9–0.

Those votes followed the council’s approval of the consent agenda, which passed 9–0 and included approval of council and boards-and-commissions minutes; a contract and agreement (not specified in the recap); two vehicle-for-hire license renewals; a new secondhand dealer license; and two resolutions appointing members to the Downtown Development Authority and the Laramie Regional Airport Joint Powers Board.

The meeting summary reported the outcomes but did not record who moved or seconded the motions for the individual items. Vote tallies provided in the transcript show each listed item passed by a 9–0 margin.

Next steps: The Trihydro agreement and the Zone 4 tank contract were approved for execution; the transcript did not specify contract amounts, implementation timelines, or the departments assigned to oversee each project. Those details were not included in the meeting recap and are not specified in the public transcript.