Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the County Governance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Leavenworth County commission approves schedule change, support letter and engineering contract; consent agenda accepted

Leavenworth County Board of County Commissioners · November 19, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At its Nov. 19 meeting the Leavenworth County Commission voted to move the Thanksgiving‑week meeting to Nov. 25, approved a letter of support for Riverside Resources' KDOT 5310 grant, accepted the consent agenda and authorized a $17,620 engineering proposal by MRJ Engineering for Fairmount Road (T‑31).

The Leavenworth County Commission took four recorded actions during its Nov. 19 meeting.

Change meeting date: Commissioners voted to move the regular meeting during Thanksgiving week to Tuesday, Nov. 25 at 9 a.m.; motion was moved, seconded and approved by roll call.

Riverside Resources letter of support: The commission approved sending a letter of support for Riverside Resources' application to the Kansas Department of Transportation 5310 grant program for transportation‑related needs; motion moved, seconded and approved by roll call.

Consent agenda: The board accepted the listed consent agenda items as presented; motion moved, seconded and approved by roll call.

MRJ Engineering contract: The commission approved a proposal from MRJ Engineering for bid documents, permitting and limited design for structure T‑31 on Fairmount Road (part of the 2026 capital improvement plan) in the amount of $17,620; motion moved, seconded and approved by roll call.

Votes: For the motions described above the meeting transcript records roll‑call affirmative votes; individual member vote names and detailed ballots were not recorded in the transcript beyond collective roll‑call affirmations.

What this means: These votes were routine procedural and contracting matters; none created a new county policy or an immediate budget appropriation beyond existing program authority.