Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Legislative Advocacy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Shawnee Heights board approves Shawnee County 'United Voice' packet; one abstention explained
Summary
The board voted to approve the Shawnee County legislative priorities packet (to be used at the Statehouse Dec. 8); motion passed with one abstention and a board member later explained her abstention during comments, citing preference that taxpayer funds support public schools accountable to local communities.
The Shawnee Heights Board of Education approved the district’s participation in the countywide 'United Voice' legislative packet to share with state legislators during visits at the Statehouse on Dec. 8.
Superintendent Sheila Meggers described the packet and said it contains five priority items unchanged from last year. “We all meet together as districts, and we talk about what things are important and what we have in common as far as legislative items,” Meggers said, explaining that printed copies with board contact information are taken to legislator meetings.
The motion to approve the packet was recorded as moved by Christy Vanmeter and seconded by Rocky Buznitz. The board approved the document; the chair recorded one abstention and four yes votes (final tally recorded as 4 yes, 0 no, 1 abstain).
Later in the meeting, a board member (Rebecca Hummer) explained her abstention during the comments period. Hummer said she struggles with the packet’s first bullet point and expressed a broader policy view: "taxpayer dollars for education should go only to public schools that are accountable to students, parents, and their communities." She described personal family experience seeking alternatives for a son with substance‑use challenges and said that if parents feel their child is not being served, they should have options — a rationale for her abstention.
The board also approved routine consent business earlier in the meeting and later moved into an executive session to discuss an individual employee’s performance under the non‑elected personnel exception to open‑meetings law (COMA); that motion passed unanimously.
