Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Special Education topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Parents and advocates urge independent audit of PSD special‑education outcomes, citing under‑identification and litigation
Summary
Multiple public commenters told the board that students with disabilities are under‑identified, graduation rates for students with IEPs are low, and the district faces multiple civil‑rights inquiries; speakers called for an independent third‑party audit of integrated services and expressed frustration over inaccessible materials and repeated complaints.
At the Poudre School District Board meeting on Oct. 7 several community members raised urgent concerns about outcomes for students with disabilities and asked the board to order independent review.
Erin Green said she attended a recent engagement session expecting meaningful discussion about outcomes for children with special needs but found those topics ignored. She alleged the district "under‑identifies 4 to 5 percent of its population for IEP services," said that "16 of 17 open federal civil‑rights investigations" involve discrimination against disabled students, and asked the board to commission an independent, third‑party audit of Integrated Services (IS) programming.
Danny Lawrence described his family's multi‑year struggle to secure accessible materials and accommodations for his son, saying his son received graduation paperwork in font and format that violated his 504 accommodation. Lawrence said multiple complaints, attorneys and federal investigations have not produced reliable remedies and warned he would intensify his public advocacy if the district did not act.
Board members and superintendent staff did not provide immediate operational responses in the meeting; several directors thanked commenters and said the board would continue engagement at future sessions. The meeting record does not show that the board committed to a third‑party audit during the Oct. 7 session.
The public comments raised specific claims that would need verification: rates of under‑identification and the number and status of federal investigations cited by speakers. The district did not dispute the numbers on the record during the meeting; staff responses in later conversations and formal records would be the basis for verification.
Speakers also emphasized the importance of accessible materials and the emotional toll on families. One parent said the district had "225 days" to address concerns before escalating public pressure; another speaker said graduation outcomes for students on IEPs are "among the lowest in the state" and recommended independent review.
