Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Water Quality topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House sustains governor's veto on residential fertilizer restrictions after debate on enforceability
Summary
Debate over HB 1293 centered on cyanobacteria and phosphorus sources; proponents argued the bill protects water quality and passed committees, while opponents said enforcement is impractical and existing DES plans and best management practices are preferable. The veto was sustained.
The House considered HB 1293, which would restrict residential fertilizer applications in certain conditions to limit phosphorus inputs linked to cyanobacteria blooms. Representative Carol Brown—drawing on her professional experience at the Department of Environmental Services—urged members to uphold the governor's veto, telling the chamber that turf fertilizer generally contains little phosphorus and that watershed-specific best management plans are a better starting point.
Cosponsors and supporters said the measure was carefully amended in committee with input from DES, the Department of Agriculture and the Farm Bureau and that it passed committees overwhelmingly. Supporters urged members to override the veto to protect water bodies, particularly in shoreline communities.
Opponents repeated concerns about enforcement. The Department of Agriculture, DES staff and industry letters were cited on the floor indicating that commercial retail bags have removed phosphorus and that enforcement would often rely on neighbor complaints, which critics said made the law toothless without practical compliance mechanisms.
After debate and a roll-call vote the governor's veto was sustained; members urged future targeted legislative work and local watershed-focused approaches.
