Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Port Commission Appointment topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Rules Committee recommends Rodney Fong for Port Commission seat

San Francisco Rules Committee · October 5, 2006
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Rules Committee voted to forward a resolution recommending Rodney Fong to the San Francisco Port Commission; Fong described family ties to Fisherman's Wharf, his role in creating a community benefit district and said he will recuse from conflicts.

The San Francisco Rules Committee voted to forward a resolution recommending Rodney Fong for appointment to the San Francisco Port Commission, a term the clerk read as ending May 1, 2010.

Fong, whose family opened a wax museum at Fisherman’s Wharf, told the committee he has run operations there for 22 years and helped form a community benefit district (CBD) that he said will generate "nearly a million dollars a year" and "over 14 years, close to $11,000,000" for cleaning and beautification in the area. He said those ties give him knowledge of the Wharf and port activities while emphasizing he understands and will comply with conflict-of-interest rules and recuse himself when necessary.

"My grandfather opened the wax museum in 1963," Fong said, summarizing his long-term connection to the waterfront.

Committee members asked about neighborhood-versus-port interests and potential conflicts; Fong repeated he has experience in consensus building and said he was "ready to serve." No members of the public spoke on his appointment during the allotted public-comment period.

Chair Ross Mercarimi said the committee would forward the recommendation to the full board and thanked Fong for his willingness to serve. The transcript does not record a formal roll-call vote; the clerk was directed to transmit the recommendation and the committee noted the standard conflict-of-interest recusal obligations would apply to any disqualifying matters.

The recommendation will now go to the full Board of Supervisors for confirmation.