Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Youth Corrections Retirement topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

House passes bill creating limited transfer window for youth corrections retirement credits

Utah House of Representatives · February 26, 1998
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Utah House approved a bill that lets some youth corrections employees apply to move retirement credits into the public safety retirement system if they meet eligibility and certification requirements; sponsors and staff said the change is intended to reduce potential litigation and will be forwarded to the Senate.

The Utah House on the floor approved a bill that creates a limited window for certain youth corrections employees to ask the retirement board to transfer service credits into the public safety retirement system.

The bill, introduced on the floor as House Bill 4 12, passed the House by voice and roll call and the clerk reported it "received 67 yes votes and 0 no votes." The measure will be sent to the Senate for consideration.

According to the floor explanation, the bill would allow employees who earned youth corrections credits between 1985 and 1998 to apply in writing to the retirement board and, as a further condition, be POST certified by Sept. 30 of the current year. The sponsor said the measure was intended to recognize that "some of the youth corrections officials and workers may in fact have a legitimate claim to a different retirement system than what they've been working under for the last 13 years." (Unidentified Representative)

The floor discussion acknowledged a fiscal-note concern. The sponsor said the retirement board had told members that the committee amendments should remove the fiscal note; the speaker added that "it is possible if a large number . . . end up qualifying under this, that it could be $30,000,000," but also indicated the expectation that only "5 or 6 individuals" may realistically qualify. Those cost figures were presented on the floor as conditional estimates rather than final accounting.

The sponsor framed the bill in part as a way to reduce potential litigation by giving affected employees a formal window to make their case and by allowing the Legislature to re-evaluate costs in a subsequent session.

The House waived summation and voted; the clerk announced passage and that the bill would be forwarded to the Senate. No amendments or sponsor names were recorded in the provided transcript beyond the floor statements attributed to an unidentified representative.