Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Utilities Billing topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Resident complains $75 emergency water shut-off fee; council and staff explain flat call charge

St. Marys City Council · September 9, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A St. Marys resident told council she was billed $75 for a three-minute emergency water shut-off and asked the city to consider prorating fees for short calls and lower-income residents; city officials said the $75 is a flat call-in fee and does not solely represent employee wages.

A St. Marys resident, Denise Cassidy of 1014 Cleveland Avenue, told city council she was billed $75 after a Sunday emergency water shut-off that she says took about three minutes. Cassidy said the charge felt excessive for a short emergency call and asked the council to consider prorating the fee or otherwise reducing the burden for lower-income residents.

Cassidy described the circumstances: a water pipe issue in her crawl space required immediate shut-off, city staff attended quickly, and the resident said the worker asked if she wanted the repair given the $75 charge. "I'm being billed $75 for that... I was billed for 3 whole minutes," Cassidy said, adding that several neighbors cannot afford such charges.

City representatives and a council member responded that the $75 fee is a flat call-in charge rather than an hourly rate. One official said, "The $75 does not cover their wages... He's paid time and a half," and another clarified, "It's $75 for a call in." Officials noted travel and call-in time can add to staff time beyond the on-site work, and that employee pay policies do not include 'triple time.'

The council did not direct an immediate policy change; the resident was thanked for raising the concern and staff explained current billing practices. No ordinance or fee schedule change was adopted at the meeting; the matter could be brought back for formal consideration if council wishes to review the utility's billing policy.