Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Licensing Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board member withdraws earlier support for accepting out‑of‑state licenses, raises concerns about outside contractors on local cleanups
Summary
At the meeting, Speaker 3 withdrew previous remarks about accepting other states’ licenses and warned that allowing out‑of‑state license recognition could bring inexperienced contractors to local EPA cleanup work and neighborhoods, citing examples of rented equipment and high costs.
Speaker 3 withdrew earlier comments about accepting licenses from other states and said doing so could invite firms unfamiliar with local cleanup work.
"I wanna withdraw some comments I made about accepting other states licensing, since they made it so difficult for us," Speaker 3 said, adding that "If we suddenly start accepting all licenses for other states, we'd have all kinds of different entities coming in here thinking we were pushed over." Speaker 3 raised concerns that some contractors working on EPA cleanups appear transient, use rented equipment and may take substantial sums out of state.
The statement came during an exchange in which other participants expressed surprise at the setup and oversight of local cleanup efforts. Speaker 4 said, "That just blows my mind how it was set up," and Speaker 1 asked who manages the cleanups and whether the EPA or state has responsibility. Speaker 3 also described an example in which a property owner believed "they had this skin cost $20,000 to take that dirt off his property." The board did not take a formal policy vote on recognizing out‑of‑state licenses during this meeting.
Why it matters: Licensing recognition affects who can legally perform regulated construction and remediation work locally. Board members framed the concern as both a consumer‑protection and oversight issue: accepting out‑of‑state credentials without stricter local review could, in their view, allow inexperienced or transient firms to bid on work in local neighborhoods.
What was said and what happens next: Participants raised questions about oversight and whether the EPA or state authorities oversee the criticized cleanup activity; no change to the board’s licensing rules was adopted at the meeting. Speaker 1 asked staff to follow up on a separate location/address question later in the meeting, but the board did not direct staff to begin a rule change or formal review of out‑of‑state license recognition at this event.
