Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Open Government topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Public commenter accuses council of hiding decisions in consent agenda; calls for transparency
Summary
At the Oct. 7 council meeting Laurie Sandow accused the council of using consent agendas to hide substantive decisions and alleged violations of the New York Open Meetings Law; council members did not make a formal legal response at the meeting.
A public commenter sharply criticized the Poughkeepsie City Common Council on Oct. 7 for what she described as routine misuse of the consent agenda and for failing to identify sponsors on resolutions, which she said undermines the New York Open Meetings Law.
Laurie Sandow told the council that consent agendas are meant for routine items but alleged they are being used to conceal decisions and avoid public scrutiny; she said none of the evening’s resolutions carried a council sponsor and challenged whether members know the city charter and their own rules. Sandow also accused Mayor Flowers of blocking people on social media and described various local problems she said the council is not addressing.
Council members did not offer a legal rebuttal on the record; they proceeded with the consent agenda and later moved several resolutions by voice vote. The transcript shows some members made procedural notes about sponsors during the action-agenda discussion, but there was no formal on-the-record legal finding about a violation.
Next steps: Sandow’s allegations are a public-complaint claim recorded in the meeting transcript. If a resident seeks enforcement of Open Meetings Law, that would typically require a formal complaint to state authorities or an independent legal challenge; the council did not announce a follow-up in the meeting.
