Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Irrigation Commissioner Election topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee hears hours of testimony on Senate Bill 517; senators table bill after mixed turnout

Agriculture, Livestock, and Irrigation · March 4, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Senate Bill 517 would limit irrigation district commissioner elections so only residents of a division vote for that division’s commissioner. Proponents said the change restores geographic representation; opponents said it risks concentrating power among large landowners. The committee voted to table the bill.

Senators of the Agriculture, Livestock, and Irrigation committee heard more than two hours of testimony on Senate Bill 517 before moving to table the measure.

Senator Josh Casimir, sponsor of SB 517, said the bill would require a commissioner to reside in the division for which they run and limit voting for that seat to residents of that division. "What it's simply doing is... a person that must reside in the district and the only people that get to vote is the people that live in that district," Casimir said when introducing the bill.

Proponents — including Riley Denning of the Fort Shaw Irrigation District and Spencer Pearson of the Greenfield Irrigation District — told the committee that allowing only division residents to vote for their division’s commissioner would ensure local representation. Pearson argued that "those in the geographical area are more likely to understand the needs of those in their geographical area" and described the proposal as consistent with existing statutes on commissioner qualifications.

Opponents, led by representatives of multiple irrigation districts and the Montana Water Resources Association, said the bill would weaken district-wide governance and could give outsized influence to large landowners. Mike Murphy, representing the Montana Water Resources Association, said commissioners must consider "funding, infrastructure issues, general operations, and management of the irrigation projects" and that electing commissioners district-wide supports those responsibilities. Erling Jewell, manager of the Greenfields Irrigation District, warned the bill "will detrimentally and unfairly tip the scales in favor of a single large producer who resides in a given precinct."

A string of district officials and irrigators reiterated concerns about consolidation of control and practical impacts. Tim Brunner, chair of the Greenfield board, told senators Greenfield encompasses about 83,000 acres across five divisions and warned that passage could allow one family to control multiple seats. Others noted existing rules that allocate votes by acreage and said districts can rebalance divisions locally if needed.

Committee members questioned witnesses on how commissioners are elected, whether terms are staggered, the role and responsibilities of commissioners, and how statutory acreage limits (discussed as a 960-acre limitation) interact with the proposed change. Witnesses described commissioners’ duties as protecting water rights and administering district budgets and maintenance.

After closing remarks from the sponsor, the committee considered procedural motions. The sponsor asked for a "do pass" recommendation; a substitute motion to table SB 517 was then offered and passed on a roll-call vote with 10 senators voting aye and 1 voting no. The chair announced the bill is tabled in committee.

The committee also handled other housekeeping items before adjourning. The hearing record for SB 517 will remain available to committee members as the sponsor and stakeholders consider options for revisions or alternative approaches.