Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Elections And Government Transparency topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

State Administration Committee advances election and government-transparency bills; HB187 tabled after ballot-timing dispute

House State Administration Committee
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The House State Administration Committee on Feb. 20 took executive action on seven bills: it passed bills adjusting candidate filing and election timing, clarified executive-branch privilege, and aligned several board districts; one election bill (HB187) was tabled after debate over whether the bill would bar issuing ballots to voters still in line.

The House State Administration Committee on Feb. 20 considered seven bills related to elections, candidate filing timelines and government transparency, approving most and tabling one after members raised constitutional and administrative concerns.

The committee passed a package of election- and process-related measures and a measure clarifying executive privilege. House Bill 207, which shortens the filing window for candidates, changes independent-candidate filing timing and alters signature thresholds, was conceptually amended in committee and passed as amended. Committee members debated whether the change to signature thresholds would make it harder for independent candidates to qualify; one member said the conceptual amendment — setting a 5% signature threshold for statewide and federal offices and a 10% threshold for legislative and other offices — was a compromise intended to balance access and administrative concerns.

Ms. Power, a committee staff member, summarized HB207: the bill shortens the filing period from 60 to 15 days, requires independent candidates to file at the same time as other candidates, and raises the signature threshold for some write-in candidates. Representative Lee and others said a 10% threshold for many races would be a heavy burden on independents; Representative Fiend cited instances of signatures rejected as inactive and warned that 5% already exceeds many states’ per-capita requirements.

The committee also advanced HB221, a bill from Representative Schubert to move municipal elections to even-numbered years; the bill passed as amended and will proceed to the full House. During debate Vice Chair Cordon said he would oppose the change, arguing it risks “nationaliz[ing] our local elections” because federal contests and large outside spending can drown out local campaigns.

House Bill 187, proposed by Representative Carter and aimed at removing the continuous tabulation requirement added in 2023, produced the session’s most contentious exchange. Staff described two sponsor amendments; one (HB187.1.1) would permit a temporary pause in tabulation while requiring consultation with the secretary of state’s office. Ms. Power said the amendment would “allow a temporary pause in tabulation and the re and release of results in the event of a significant issue” and would require consultation with the secretary of state before pausing.

A later sponsor amendment (point 1.2) added language stating that “ballots may not be issued after the close of polls and the start of tabulation on Election Day” and included a severability clause. Several members questioned the legal meaning of the line. Representative Lee said the provision “feels very unconstitutional to me” if it would bar voters standing in line at the close of polls from voting. Another member (during discussion) described his understanding that voters already in line at poll closing would still be allowed to vote; members requested further review from legal counsel and leadership. After multiple roll calls and a substitute motion to table, the committee ultimately tabled HB187 as amended.

On government-transparency matters, the committee passed HB271 as amended. Representative Schubert moved language to narrow several proposed changes and to retain longstanding standards for what qualifies as exempt or confidential information and to avoid automatically expiring exemptions; the sponsor described the amendment as “reasonably friendly,” and the amendment and bill passed.

Other bills passed with limited debate: HB248 (removing the word "newspaper" so more formats may carry obituaries), HB272 (codifying the legislative "junk" process into statute and clarifying legislative privilege; staff said there is no fiscal note), and HB279 (adjusting districts for several state boards to align with congressional districts except for one county).

Votes at a glance: - HB221 (move municipal elections to even years) — Passed as amended; will proceed to the House floor (roll call recorded and proxies noted). - HB187 (remove continuous tabulation; allow temporary pause + ballot-issuance language) — Tabled after debate over whether line-language would bar votes by those in line at poll closing (committee recorded multiple roll calls and used proxies). - HB207 (shorten filing window, independent-candidate rules, signature thresholds) — Passed as amended after a conceptual amendment setting 5% for statewide/federal and 10% for legislative/other races. - HB248 (remove "newspaper" from obituary code) — Passed by voice vote. - HB271 (clarify governor's executive privilege) — Amended and passed (amendment preserved prior limits and removed a proposed mandatory change to attorneys' fees language). - HB272 (codify legislative "junk" process and clarify privilege) — Passed; staff said no fiscal note. - HB279 (align board districts with congressional districts, except specified county) — Passed by voice vote.

Committee next steps and scheduling: the chair reviewed next week’s schedule (no meeting Monday or Tuesday; three bill hearings Wednesday; a tour of the Montana Law Enforcement Agency Thursday; executive work Friday) and adjourned the committee.

The committee record shows multiple roll-call tallies and proxy votes; members asked staff to clarify legal definitions (for example, the meaning of “close of polls”) before further action on contested language.