Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Education Curriculum topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Uxbridge committee hears PRISM grant update; Dr. Dwyer outlines three-year curriculum purchase and budget plan
Summary
The Uxbridge School Committee received a briefing from Dr. Dwyer on a PRISM grant-supported curriculum purchase, a three-year vendor purchase order, implementation and parent-communication plans, and how the district will cover the grant match; the meeting ended with a procedural adjournment.
Get email alerts on the Education Curriculum topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Dr. Dwyer told the Uxbridge School Committee on Aug. 8 that the district has a new purchase order from the publisher for a three-year curriculum contract and has secured approval from DESE to proceed. “They gave their okay, and so we are ready to go whenever you give the approval,” Dr. Dwyer said.
The update centered on a PRISM grant that Dr. Dwyer said totals “450,000” and is split by grade bands (she stated figures of “189 for 4 through 8, and 270,000 for grades k through 3”). She said the grant provides roughly 50% reimbursement for curriculum materials, leaving the district responsible for the local share. Dr. Dwyer described the package of funds as including stipends, professional development and textbooks.
Why it matters: Dr. Dwyer urged the committee to prepare an October warrant article specifically authorizing curriculum material purchases at the fall town meeting, saying that action could “save you hundreds of thousands of dollars going forward.” Committee members emphasized the tradeoff of the three-year contract: favorable pricing now but potentially higher costs later if renewal pricing is not offered.
Committee members pressed for clarity on implementation and budget impact. A member asked whether the district could pilot the new curriculum with professional development this year and delay full rollout; Dr. Dwyer said pilot timing was possible in principle but the district lacked the textbook funds to buy both the new materials and existing sets. She gave a specific example: “CKLA cost $20,000 for student consumables,” which have not been purchased because the district awaited the grant.
On funding sources, Dr. Dwyer said she is assembling the local match by combining textbook allocations, Title I funds and other operating budget lines and that building principals had previously set aside funds to accommodate the change in some cases. She told the committee she had been in contact with building staff and had already secured a $25,000 allocation for ELA from a high school budget line.
Committee members asked for a consolidated report that tracks past curriculum changes and current materials by grade so members and the public can follow decisions over time. Dr. Dwyer said she would supply documentation (a “NextOps” report was referenced) but cautioned she could not promise a full package by September given the intensive work required to stand up the PRISM grants and training.
Parents and communication: Members recommended a family-facing communication once teachers have completed professional development; Dr. Dwyer said she would plan a newsletter in September after PD on Aug. 26 so teachers would be prepared to answer questions.
Process and next steps: The chair said conversations were underway with KP Law to prepare the warrant article for town meeting and the item will appear on the committee’s Aug. 19 agenda for full consideration. Committee members also flagged that the district’s math curriculum will need replacement next year and asked that budget planning account for that future expense.
Formal action: The meeting ended with a procedural motion to adjourn, which the committee approved unanimously in a roll call.
What the committee said (selected quotes): “They gave their okay, and so we are ready to go whenever you give the approval,” Dr. Dwyer said when describing DESE’s sign-off. “It could save you hundreds of thousands of dollars going forward,” Dr. Dwyer said of placing a specific warrant article at fall town meeting.
The committee did not vote on the curriculum purchase itself during the Aug. 8 meeting; members requested additional budget detail and a consolidated report to review at a later meeting.
