Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Panel hears HB 503 to stiffen penalties for repeat fleeing/eluding, law‑enforcement witnesses cite safety risks
Summary
Representative Denise Baum told the Senate Judiciary Committee HB 503 would add elements to fleeing and eluding statutes, including language on refusing to stop and aggravated penalties for repeat offenders; police witnesses cited recent fatalities and urged concurrence while some senators sought drafting clarifications.
Representative Denise Baum opened the hearing on House Bill 5 03, describing changes to Montana’s fleeing and eluding statutes. The sponsor said HB 503 adds an element for ‘refusing to bring the motor vehicle to a stop,’ raises penalties to a felony for repeat offenders, imports reckless‑driving language for aggravated cases, and applies where a driver leaves the state while being pursued.
Law‑enforcement proponents emphasized public‑safety risks. Dan Smith, executive director of the Montana Police Protective Association and a 24‑year former officer, described pursuits as dangerous and said the bill is aimed at intentional flight rather than inadvertent speeding. Brian Thompson of the Montana Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association and Captain Brandon Wooley of the Billings Police Department gave examples where restricted pursuit policies created gaps in accountability and cited recent local deaths tied to fleeing drivers.
The committee questioned operational thresholds. Senators asked about the 10‑mph threshold that can convert speeding into aggravated flight and about the ‘refusing to stop’ language; witnesses said the 10‑mph figure tracks existing statute and that officer discretion and pursuit initiation (lights/siren) provide context. Questions about interstate flight elicited descriptions of hot‑pursuit practices and cooperation with neighboring jurisdictions.
Representative Baum said she would consider a friendly amendment to strike the newly added refusing‑to‑stop language if the House floor or senators requested it; several senators indicated they had submitted or requested amendments for clarity. The committee closed the hearing and later moved HB 503 to concur in executive action.
