Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Infrastructure Water Sewer topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee backs bill to let county water, sewer districts use DEQ development plans to issue will‑serve letters
Summary
The Local Government Committee heard from DEQ and district managers that HB 534 would let county water and sewer districts use DEQ‑approved development plans to issue will‑serve letters and stage capacity increases, helping subdivisions move forward while protecting public health.
Representative Courtney Springer introduced House Bill 534 to allow county water and sewer districts to use Department of Environmental Quality‑approved development plans so districts may plan capacity expansions and issue will‑serve letters before construction completes. Supporters said the change helps align infrastructure sequencing with housing development.
DEQ Water Quality Division Administrator Lindsey Krywaruchka told the committee that the development plan model already works for municipalities and “we are in full support of this bill.” She said the plan lets a district stay “on track for their plan and building that capacity” and enables developers to begin subdivision review earlier, potentially reducing reliance on septic systems.
Rodney Olson, general manager of Lakeside County Water and Sewer District, said his district first identified expansion needs in 2020 and expects phase 2 capacity additions no earlier than 2027. Under current rules, he said, developers cannot get a will‑serve letter until upgrades are complete; HB 534 would allow a will‑serve letter once a DEQ‑approved development plan is in place. “It would allow us to issue a will‑serve letter so the developer could start their process of subdivision review,” Olson said.
Committee members asked whether rates for existing customers would rise to cover expansion costs. Krywaruchka and Olson said DEQ charges a nominal review fee for development‑plan approval and that district rate impacts depend on how projects are financed; rate studies required by SRF borrowing would set long‑term rate structures. Olson said the bill itself does not change rate‑setting requirements.
Proponents including engineering firms and county planning boards said the tool makes development more feasible and can accelerate housing by pairing improvements with demand. The bill passed the committee on executive action by voice vote; the committee recorded the bill as passed out of committee.
The next step is second reading on the House floor; the committee did not adopt substantive amendments during the hearing.
