Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Judicial Oversight topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

House Judiciary committee backs censure resolution for two Bozeman municipal judges after heated debate

House Judiciary Committee · April 17, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The House Judiciary Committee advanced HR 4, a resolution urging censure and the resignation of two Bozeman municipal judges, after extended debate over due process and separation-of-powers concerns. The motion passed the committee by roll call.

The House Judiciary Committee voted to advance House Resolution 4, a measure introduced by Representative Mallette that urges the censure and immediate resignation of two Bozeman municipal judges for alleged misconduct.

Supporters argued the resolution was necessary to hold judges accountable and to register the legislature's condemnation in public record. Representative Mallette introduced the resolution and Ms. Weiss read its text into the record, saying it "would provide for a resolution of the House of Representatives declaring that Bozeman Municipal Judge J. Colleen Harrington and Bozeman Municipal Judge Carolina Tierney be censured for official misconduct and malfeasance in office, and calling for their immediate resignation from office."

Opponents raised constitutional and legal objections. Representative Griffith warned the committee that endorsing allegations in a resolution could amount to a bill of attainder and expose members to defamation risk, stating, "we're being asked to vote on a summary of facts that has not been proven either true or false," and cautioning that a censure could fall outside the legislature's immunity. Representative Staffman and others emphasized due process concerns and said the matter had been considered by the Judicial Standards Commission; Staffman said the resolution risked "declaring [individuals] guilty without a trial."

Representative Overstreet defended the committee's action as a legislative judgment distinct from a judicial proceeding, arguing the resolution is a statement of legislative opinion and not a law that imposes punishment. He said the committee could rely on uncontroverted documentary evidence to make inferences and urged members to consider constituents' perceptions.

The committee debated both legal doctrine and political accountability for more than an hour. After discussion, the committee took a roll-call vote and the motion passed with 12 voting in favor and 8 opposed. The chair announced: "The motion passes. HR 4 has passed House Judiciary." The resolution will now proceed according to legislative rules for further consideration.

No criminal findings were made in committee; the measure is a legislative resolution urging censure and calling for resignation. The transcript records multiple members calling for caution about constitutional limits and the need for due process, while others said public rebuke via resolution is an appropriate congressional forum for expressing legislative judgment.

Next steps: The committee reported HR 4 as passed. Any subsequent action, including whether the full House will consider the resolution or whether prosecutors or judicial-review bodies will pursue separate investigations, was not recorded in committee testimony.