Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Lakefront Assessment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board upholds Pewaukee assessor's valuation for lakefront Peterson Drive property
Summary
After contested testimony from an owner's attorney and an independent appraiser, the Pewaukee Board of Review upheld the assessor's valuation for a Peterson Drive lakefront parcel that sold in 2022 for $2.3 million. The hearing focused on whether the purchase price or more recent comparable sales better reflected market value on the statutory assessment date.
The City of Pewaukee Board of Review voted to sustain the assessor's valuation for a lakefront property on Peterson Drive after a contested hearing in which the owner's attorney and an independent appraiser disputed the city's reliance on the property's recent sale.
Attorney Kirsten Hildebrandt, representing property owners Carl and Corey Hutchinson (Tapestry Trust), presented a restricted appraisal and argued that more recent comparable sales and the restricted appraisal supported a lower opinion of value — her client's agent placed an opinion near $1.94 million and the appraiser, Felix Castro, testified to a restricted appraisal opinion of $2,000,000 as of Jan. 1, 2025.
City assessor staff responded that the property sold in an arm's-length transaction for $2,300,000 in June 2022, and under Wisconsin law (the Markarian hierarchy) a recent sale of the subject property is the strongest evidence of market value. The assessor said staff time‑adjusted sales to the statutory assessment date and presented comparable sales and adjustments for frontage, size and condition.
Board members pressed both sides on timing and methodology: whether 2022 sales are 'several years' old for January 1, 2025 assessment purposes, whether restricted appraisals that omit interior inspection are appropriately weighted, and how days on market and lake frontage differences were adjusted. Appraiser Castro said he gave most weight to two recent sales and used a weighted average (30/50/15) to arrive at $2,000,000; the assessor emphasized that the subject sale is tier 1 evidence and that days on market for the subject (3 days) showed strong demand.
After closing arguments the board voted by roll call to sustain the assessor's valuation and record the sale price as representative of value for assessment purposes. The board did not adopt the restricted appraisal value; no further relief was granted.
