Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Taxes Registration Fees topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate panel advances bill to cut motor-vehicle registration fees after fiscal changes to protect counties
Summary
Senate Finance and Claims heard testimony on Senate Bill 327, which would lower motor-vehicle registration fees; sponsor said amendments and a floor on entitlement-share growth were added to prevent negative impacts on counties and special revenue accounts.
The Senate Finance and Claims Committee moved forward with Senate Bill 327, a proposal from Senator Greg Hertz that would lower motor-vehicle registration fees statewide. Hertz told the committee the bill "is all about lowering rates on motor vehicle registration fees" and estimated the change would reduce registrations-derived general fund receipts from about $100 million to roughly half that amount.
Hertz said he worked with fiscal staff to add an amendment aimed at protecting special revenue accounts and county entitlement-share payments. Dylan Cole of the Department of Revenue explained that the entitlement-share formula — created in 2001 and tied to vehicle titling and other revenue streams — would, under the bill as originally drafted, have caused year-over-year entitlement growth to decline. Cole said the amendment establishes a minimum growth floor of about 2.5% and a cap of roughly 3–3.5% to hold local payments ‘‘whole’’ while still implementing fee relief.
Sam Schafer of the fiscal division described how vehicle-related revenues feed into a multi-part growth formula and said the amendment’s floor was derived from current forecast assumptions (HJ 2 baseline). Hertz told members the revised fiscal note would show an additional general-fund impact of approximately $3 million to preserve entitlement-share growth under the amendment.
Agency witnesses — including Joy Ross (Fish, Wildlife & Parks) and Russ Christofersen (MDT motor carrier enforcement) — were present to answer technical questions about the fiscal note and operational impacts. Committee members pressed staff on the long-term revenue outlook, forecast uncertainty and whether the revised fiscal note reflected the amendment’s changes.
The committee later took executive action on SB 327 and passed the bill in the evening session (roll-call recorded as 12 yes, 10 no). The committee record shows the amendment was intended to protect counties and special revenue while delivering registration-fee relief to motorists. The bill now advances with the committee’s amendments as recorded.
