Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Property Tax Reform topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Broad property-tax overhaul HB231 draws full hearing; sponsors tout relief, opponents warn of shifts
Summary
HB231 proposes owner-occupied rate cuts, long-term rental incentives, a bifurcated commercial rate, and an agstead hold-harmless provision. Sponsors and the governor's office framed it as targeted relief for homeowners, renters and small businesses; opponents included trade groups and taxpayers' associations who said the plan could shift costs to centrally-assessed properties and cause local mill-levy volatility.
Representative Lou Jones opened on House Bill 231 as a comprehensive property-tax relief package developed through the governor’s property-tax task force. Jones described three central components: a lower owner-occupied rate (1.1% on owner dwellings up to a dynamic threshold set at four times the median), a lower rate for long-term rentals to incentivize workforce housing, and a bifurcated commercial rate that would tax small commercial values at a lower rate (1.5%) while applying a higher rate to value above a threshold. He also proposed an "agstead" provision to hold farmsteads harmless at the existing 1.35% rate.
Jones said the bill is designed to shift some tax burden to nonresident owners and larger commercial taxpayers and to bring many homeowners and small businesses relief after recent reappraisal-driven increases. "Who speaks for the 32,000 small businesses?" Jones asked, noting the bill's intent to help main-street firms and long-term renters while limiting harm to agriculture and local governments.
Proponents included Ryan Evans from the governor's budget office, NFIB, AARP Montana, the Montana Farm Bureau and local county commissioners, each emphasizing broad relief for homeowners, protection for older Montanans on fixed incomes, and measures to encourage rental supply. "This bill would help Montana homeowners and commercial owners," said a governor's office witness.
Opponents — including the Montana Taxpayers Association, Montana Chamber of Commerce, Montana Budget & Policy Center, and the Montana Petroleum Association — raised distributional concerns. Bob Story presented DOR-derived county-level charts and warned that while many homeowners would benefit, the proposal could cause mill-levy increases in some counties, shift burdens to centrally-assessed utilities and large industries, and raise notable tax increases for a minority of large commercial holders. Story recommended alternative, revenue-neutral commercial-rate adjustments (for example, lowering a single commercial rate rather than bifurcating it) to reduce risk of dramatic local shifts.
Department of Revenue and budget-office staff answered technical questions about administering owner-dwelling status, triggers for reassessing residency (for example, temporary nursing-facility stays), using rebate data to identify out-of-state owners, and the limitations of available data for long-term enforcement. DOR staff said they would work from application datasets and expected administrative triggers for address changes and ownership transfers, but noted uncertainty beyond the recent rebate window.
Representative Jones closed by emphasizing estimated beneficiaries — roughly 230,000 primary homeowners, 130,000 long-term rentals, and 32,000 small businesses — and reiterated the bill's agstead protections and intent to fund reductions primarily by shifting some burden to nonresident and large commercial taxpayers. The committee closed the hearing without immediate action but signaled extensive follow-up questions and potential amendments.
Next steps: DOR and the governor's budget office will provide detailed county-level modeling and administrative feasibility analysis; committee will consider amendments that respond to distributional and implementation concerns.
