Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use And Permitting topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Bill would let homeowners appeal costly post‑construction septic changes to local governing body
Summary
House Bill 318 would require local governing bodies to provide an appeal process when local officials impose post‑construction requirements on septic systems that cost more than $500; sponsor said the bill responds to homeowners’ anecdotal reports of costly retrofits and would provide recourse rather than automatically requiring costly corrective work.
Representative Larry Brewster introduced House Bill 318, which would require local regulations to provide for an appeal to the local governing body when a permittee is asked to implement subsequent requirements after a permit is issued and those requirements would cost more than $500 to implement.
Brewster said the bill is intended to give homeowners a chance to have somebody else review cases where, after construction, inspectors or regulators require changes that impose substantial unexpected costs. “So it's just an opportunity to have one other person look at it,” he said, describing homeowner anecdotes in which completed septic systems were later ordered to be altered at great expense.
Committee members asked whether installers could face liability and what typical septic system costs are. The sponsor described the bill’s origin as anecdotal and said he did not have an authoritative statewide cost figure; during discussion a figure of $17,000 was mentioned conversationally as an example of system cost. Representative Elmore asked whether “local governing body” means county commissioners; Brewster said it generally would, though the process could also apply in a city where appropriate.
No proponents, opponents or informational witnesses testified for HB318. Brewster closed by saying the bill creates a recourse pathway for homeowners facing substantial post‑construction costs. The committee closed the public hearing and did not take a committee vote during the session recorded in the transcript.
