Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Elections And Petitions topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate committee hears cleanup bill to clarify local ballot and petition procedures
Summary
Senate Bill 11 would align local-government ballot issue language with state law and clarify local petition procedures; proponents cited the need for a consistent legal review process while the sponsor flagged a technical numbering fix and an unresolved small fiscal note.
Senate Bill 11, presented to the Senate Local Government Committee by Sen. Forrest Mandeville, would revise how local‑government ballot issues and petitions are processed to align with existing statewide petition law. Mandeville said the bill, requested by the Senate Administration and Veterans Affairs Interim Committee, is primarily a technical cleanup to clarify how local measures get on the ballot and to provide a consistent framework for county clerks and recorders.
"This would revise local government ballot issues to just clarify," sponsor Forrest Mandeville said when he introduced the bill and noted a technical amendment will likely be needed to remove a hardcoded '20' in the proposed ordinance number on page 4 of the draft.
Proponents told the committee they support the bill. Tod Devlin, testifying for the Montana Association of Counties, called it "a clean up bill" that aligns local ballot issues with Title 13 and Title 7. Regina Plattenberg, Ravalli County clerk and recorder, said the measure is "a long time in the making," noting previous statewide petition cleanup work prompted similar county‑level questions and that local clerks welcome clearer rules.
Eric Bryson of the Montana Association of Counties explained the bill incorporates a legal review step similar to the state petition process. "That same process is identified in this bill ... there is an evaluation to make sure that it's single subject, that it conforms with the rest of the provisions," Bryson said, while also acknowledging that, even after review, parties retain the ability to challenge petitions in court.
Sen. Ellsworth asked about the fiscal note; Mandeville said he had not signed it and observed that the fiscal note appears to list a token dollar amount. Committee members were directed to the fiscal documentation for details. Committee members also discussed whether the bill's provisions would prevent future disputes; Bryson said local petitions and litigation have been uncommon but the bill provides clearer statutory structure to reduce ambiguity.
The hearing concluded with Mandeville saying stakeholders would continue work on the amendment language and with the vice chair closing the SB 11 hearing. No formal action was taken; committee members said executive action would be scheduled later.
Next steps: the committee is expected to consider executive action on SB 11 at a later meeting.
