Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Court Administration topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee OKs Bill Letting Chief Justice Appoint Court Administrator

Senate Judiciary Committee
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Senate Bill 342 would make the chief justice the appointing authority for the state court administrator; supporters said the change codifies existing practice and improves accountability, while opponents warned about concentrating appointment power. The committee passed SB342 by roll call (5–3).

The Senate Judiciary Committee passed Senate Bill 342, a measure that would formalize the process by which the state court administrator is appointed, assigning appointment authority to the chief justice. Senator John Fuller, who opened the bill, said the change would improve accountability and transparency in the court administrator’s office and reduce past political influence on the position.

Bowen Greenwood, the elected Clerk of the Montana Supreme Court, provided proponent testimony earlier in the hearing for a different bill but also participated in discussion about judicial administration. Participants noted the proposal largely codifies long‑standing practice — the chief justice has historically filled administrative duties for the court — while acknowledging the language clarifies responsibility for the appointment.

Committee members questioned whether vesting appointment authority with the chief justice would create a ‘political’ appointment or whether it simply reflects existing practice and enhances clarity. Supporters argued it is consistent with the chief justice’s administrative role and would make the reporting line and accountability clearer; critics cautioned about concentrating appointment authority and urged clear language to preserve employee protections.

After discussion, a motion to pass SB342 carried on roll call, 5 in favor and 3 opposed. The committee transmitted SB342 out of Senate Judiciary for further consideration.