Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Land Use topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Residents urge Coweta commissioners to resist rezoning rural conservation land for data center

Coweta County Board of Commissioners
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At a Coweta County commission meeting, multiple residents urged commissioners to reject rezoning rural conservation land for a proposed Prologis data center, citing traffic, noise, buffer sizes and concerns that the county ordinance favors a specific project.

Coweta County commissioners heard several speakers on Tuesday night urging them not to rezone rural conservation land for a proposed data center by Prologis.

Public commenters said narrow rural roads, noise and the proximity to existing power infrastructure make the site unsuitable for large data-center development. Laura Beth, who identified herself as representing residents of rural Coweta, said the county’s proposed 300-foot buffer would not blunt noise from cooling towers and turbines and asked the commissioners to adopt a 1,500-foot buffer instead.

"At 7,920 feet I can hear Plant Yates," Laura Beth said. "Do you think a 300-foot buffer would muffle the sounds of a data center? We have asked for a larger buffer and hope that the county listens to the residents and increases it to the 1,500 feet requested."

Ron Bachrath (District 2) questioned consultant tax-revenue estimates and raised concerns about abatements: "If we don't do that, how can you make objective decisions?" he said, arguing that published projections from consultants appeared inconsistent with other estimates.

Daniel Franz, a Summer Grove resident, asked the board to investigate whether the county could assess a sales tax on a data center's power usage as an alternative revenue source, offering back-of-envelope figures for commissioners to consider. He urged staff and the county attorney to research the legal options.

Chair responded that staff would investigate the sales-tax question and consult the county attorney.

No zoning action on a specific data-center parcel was taken during the meeting; the remarks came during the public comment period. Commissioners previously set a public hearing on Nov. 4, 2025 for a separate amendment to the C-9 (commercial amusement) zoning chapter; staff clarified that the C-9 amendment under consideration would remove a current prohibition on central loudspeakers and would not itself rezone property for data-center use.

The public-comment speakers and staff emphasized that any rezoning or incentives would be addressed in later, separate proceedings.

The commission adjourned after completing the meeting’s agenda.