Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Timber Industry topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Senators debate $6 million loan program aimed at reopening closed sawmills

Senate Finance and Claims · April 15, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

House Bill 876 would appropriate $6 million of capital development funds as low-interest loans through the Board of Investments to help reopen sawmills closed in the prior 48 months. Proponents said the program would restore jobs, support forest health and help wildfire mitigation; opponents warned narrow eligibility and market risks for existing mills.

Representative John Fitzpatrick (House District 76) presented the Montana Sawmill Revitalization Act, which would appropriate $6,000,000 of capital development funds to the Board of Investments to offer low-interest loans to entities seeking to reopen sawmills closed in the prior 48 months.

Proponents testified that the timber sector has lost capacity and jobs — with testimony citing closures, lost log markets and impacts on forest-management capacity and wildfire risk. Grant Kier of the Missoula Economic Partnership and others said the loan program would act as a lever in larger capital stacks to attract private investment and restore processing capacity in Western Montana.

Opponents — including Sun Mountain Lumber — argued the bill is too narrowly written (limited to recently closed mills) and could disadvantage operating mills, worsen byproduct markets and fail to address supply constraints derived from federal land management and litigation.

Questions from senators covered project eligibility, whether the loan would be direct or paired with lenders (Board of Investments indicated it would work with qualified lenders and participate as a portion of a capital stack), workforce and housing constraints in mill communities, and potential competition with existing mills. The sponsor emphasized the program is intended as leverage and not full project funding.

Ending: Committee discussion closed with no vote taken; sponsors and Board of Investments staff offered to provide technical details for executive action.