Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the MFFA Conduit Bonding topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate committee hears bill to let Montana Facility Finance Authority issue more conduit bonds, broaden eligibility
Summary
Senate Bill 104 would let the Montana Facility Finance Authority (MFFA) expand conduit bond financing beyond nonprofits and health care, raise the Authority's bond issuance cap to about $1.5 billion, and add an inflation adjustment; proponents said it would unlock projects in rural Montana while bond counsel said conduit debt is not a state obligation.
Senator Gail Lammers introduced Senate Bill 104 on behalf of the sponsor, saying the measure would expand access to low‑cost capital by enlarging the Montana Facility Finance Authority's role and raising its bond issuance cap to roughly $1.5 billion with a biannual inflation adjustment. "This is a proposal that will work to unlock new economic opportunities and fuel growth across Montana," Lammers said.
Adam Gill, executive director of the Montana Facility Finance Authority, told the committee the MFFA has 40 years of experience issuing conduit bonds for nonprofit health care projects and other public‑benefit facilities. "Conduit bonds are an essential driver of economic development," Gill said, and he emphasized that "conduit debt is not an obligation of the State." Gill underscored that the bill, as drafted, would not commit public funds, would not allow borrowers to use proceeds for operating costs, and would be voluntary for participants.
Business and local economic development witnesses described projects they say would benefit if the Authority could act as a statewide conduit issuer. Turk Stovall, representing Yellowstone Eagle Solutions, said an expansion of his Shepherd feed yard would add about 40,000 head of capacity, include digesters to harvest renewable natural gas and CO2, extend a natural‑gas line into Shepherd and create "at least 50 full time positions." Economic developers said similar tools in other states have helped attract manufacturers and value‑added processing.
Committee members pressed staff and witnesses on key details: whether interest rates are market‑set (Gill said they are), whether bond interest would be tax‑exempt for investors (Gill said that depends on the financing and the borrower's tax status), and how conduit issuance interacts with local governments. Nathan Bilyeu, bond counsel, walked through statutory language and case law and told senators that both Montana precedent and federal decisions treat conduit issuances as private obligations that generally do not expose the state to repayment liability.
Several senators said they remain cautious about expanding the program and asked for the technical legal analysis the MFFA can provide. Gill said the Authority requires underwriting and board approval of projects and described a process intended to screen for repayment risk; bond counsel said the Montana Supreme Court has upheld the separation between conduit debt and government liability in prior cases.
The hearing closed without a committee vote. Senator Lammers urged members to support the bill so the MFFA could "level the playing field between rural and urban counties, reduce unnecessary red tape, and make it easier" for projects to access financing. Chair Noland then moved on to the next item on the agenda.
