Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Demolition 42 Henry topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Uxbridge historic commission raises no objection to demolition at 42 Henry Street after developer briefing
Summary
After a presentation from developer David Pine, the Uxbridge Historic Commission determined the proposed demolition at 42 Henry Street should be reported to state records and voted to register 'no objection' to the owner beginning demolition and site work, while asking to be notified when demolition is complete.
The Uxbridge Historic Commission voted July 17 to report changes at 42 Henry Street to the state historic records and to register no objection to the property owner beginning demolition and site work, after a developer described plans to remove the existing house and garage and build three new single‑family units.
David Pine, who identified himself as a representative of Lobosur and Ferrero Construction Corp., told the commission his firm bought the property in June and that the zoning board had approved plans in April 2025 for three separate single‑family units. "So my name is David Pine. I work for, Lobosur and Ferrero Construction Corp.," he said while summarizing the project and the team's readiness to move forward with asbestos abatement and design work.
Commission members asked technical and historical questions during the presentation, including whether the existing structure is compliant with current bylaws and whether outbuildings lie on the parcel. The commission chair noted that the town has no demolition‑delay bylaw and that reporting the demolition to the state historic registry is the commission's primary duty: "Uxbridge does not have a delay by law, so we would not be delaying the project in any way," the chair told the room. The chair also warned that updates to the state registry can take time: the commission may not see an official record change for up to a year after filing.
The commission sought confirmation that asbestos removal and other pre‑demolition steps were underway; Pine said asbestos in the garage was being removed and that his firm would notify the commission before demolition. A commissioner also flagged the possibility of animal remains being encountered during excavation; Pine said the team would stop and report any unexpected finds for appropriate handling.
After discussion the chair entertained a motion that the commission report the change when notified and register no objection to the work proceeding. The motion was moved, seconded and carried by voice vote.
The commission's action does not grant a zoning or building permit; Pine indicated the project had received zoning board approval earlier this year and that the developer still needs to satisfy any required municipal approvals. The commission asked Pine to notify staff when demolition is imminent so the commission can file the appropriate historic record updates.
The commission will return to related matters — including how this and similar projects affect local historic resources and the registry process — at future meetings.
