Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Swap topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Fallon County leaders outline proposed land swap with city, raise questions about access, liabilities and valuation
Summary
Commissioners and staff reviewed a proposed swap of city and county parcels—covering a 160‑acre golf course/airport tract, a ~40‑acre former landfill, Triangle Park and a landlocked 10‑acre lot—and discussed sewer and Bonneville water line easements, liability for the landfill, and whether the county or city will bear long‑term maintenance costs. The swap was described as an "all or nothing" package; valuation and access concerns remain unresolved.
Unidentified Speaker presented details of a proposed land swap that would transfer multiple parcels between county and city ownership, including a 160‑acre tract used by the golf course and airport, a roughly 40‑acre former landfill on Sandstone Road, Triangle Park and adjacent baseball fields, and a separate 10‑acre landlocked parcel. Commissioners focused the discussion on legal access, utility easements and long‑term liabilities.
Commissioners and staff traced the path of a sewer trunk line and an older Bonneville water line (described in the record as a 4‑inch line installed in 1972), and discussed how service connections and easements would move with any transfer. As one county representative explained, "You take it all, or we'll just let you pay us," framing the negotiation as a single package rather than piecemeal transfers.
Speakers noted the county currently leases the former dump area for grazing and that parts of the parcels contain county‑run facilities (man camp, gun range). The landfill parcel was described as reclaimed and unused since the 1990s, but liability remains a concern: "The city is forever liable for that landfill," an unidentified speaker stated. Staff confirmed the former dump is not landlocked but did confirm a separate 10‑acre parcel is landlocked without county access.
Commissioners pressed for clarity on specific points staff flagged as important to any swap: whether utility trunk lines and service easements would transfer, whether portions of the land (for example, areas used as a golf course irrigation source) would continue to furnish water rights or revenues to the current owner, and whether the county or city would be responsible for future repairs. A county representative said the sewer line had been in service for about 25 years and described it as functioning with gravel encasement; staff proposed a camera inspection (estimated in the discussion as $2,200) prior to finalizing any agreement.
County negotiators provided a rough monetary frame for the package—reported in the meeting as "3 to 3.5"—but the transcript does not record the unit (e.g., thousands, hundreds of thousands, millions) or the formal appraisal underpinning that figure. Commissioners asked staff to provide maps, easement language and a clearer breakdown of what would transfer before moving the swap forward.
Next steps: commissioners requested clearer documentation—delineated easements, utility maps and a final valuation—from staff to evaluate potential liabilities and operational implications. No formal action on the swap was taken during the meeting.
