Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Budget topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Fiscal Court approves NG9-1-1 upgrade amendment and $193,531.73 airport escrow payout

Gallatin County Fiscal Court · October 2, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Gallatin County Fiscal Court approved Ordinance 091125 (second/final reading) for a state/regional NG9-1-1 upgrade and an emergency amendment to pay a prior-year airport escrow retainage of $193,531.73; both measures passed by voice vote.

The Gallatin County Fiscal Court on Oct. 2 approved a budget amendment related to a state and regional upgrade of the NG9-1-1 system and an emergency amendment to pay a prior-year airport escrow retainage.

Staff presented Ordinance 091125 for a second and final reading tied to a state/regional grant to upgrade the county’s NG9-1-1 system. The presiding officer took a motion for approval; the court approved the amendment by voice vote.

Separately, the court approved an emergency amendment (file number 41100225 in the meeting discussion) to pay retainage owed to a party referred to in the record as "Cleary" for airport work. The amendment increases the airport grant budget and authorizes payment of $193,531.73 from airport escrow to cover the prior-year retainage; the same amount was recorded as an expenditure and drawn from airport escrow funds. The presenter said the retainage carried over from a prior fiscal year and required county action to complete the payout.

Magistrates approved both measures by voice votes; the meeting transcript did not record an itemized roll-call tally for either vote. The presenter referenced grant funding and state/regional approval in connection with the NG9-1-1 upgrade; specific grant program identifiers beyond the ordinance and file numbers were not provided during the meeting.

The court did not attach additional conditions at the time of approval; staff said further coordination with state or regional partners would continue as required.