Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Search Warrants topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Bill to clarify how search warrants are served draws few opponents but prompts operational questions
Summary
Sen. Jeremy Trevis told the committee SB444 would clarify that a search warrant can be exhibited at the place to be searched or shown to a known lawful occupant; proponents said the change reduces conflicts and may prevent escalations when occupants demand to see a warrant. Committee members asked about serving minors, telephonic warrants, and practical consequences of failing to leave a copy.
Senator Jeremy Trevis (Senate District 10) presented a one‑page bill to clarify that service and return of a search warrant may be made by exhibiting the original or a duplicate at the place to be searched and by showing it to a "known lawful occupant." He said the change was intended to reduce conflicts during execution by giving occupants the chance to see the warrant.
Bart Crabtree of the Montana Citizens Council on Judicial Accountability supported the measure as a "straightforward, common sense" clarification. Committee members probed operational issues: telephonic warrants and printed copies (officers typically print electronic warrants and leave a copy), whether minors or adults with cognitive disabilities can be "served," and what happens to evidence if service formality is not followed. Sponsor and law‑enforcement witnesses said practice generally includes leaving a copy at the premises and that failure to serve properly does not automatically exclude evidence—courts decide remedy.
Representative questions included whether the term "occupant" has an age or competency threshold; sponsor and staff said operational practice presumes adult occupants or adult representatives and that courts would adjudicate remedies for service failures.
What happens next: Sponsor requested do‑pass; committee planned additional review about occupant definitions and implementation details.
