Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Law Enforcement Coordination topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
HB 439 debate centers on local notification for federal law‑enforcement activity
Summary
Sponsor Representative Lee Deming said amendments will narrow HB 439 to a notification requirement to avoid 'blue on blue' incidents; sheriffs supported notice while police associations and chiefs warned the bill as drafted could hinder task forces and federal‑local cooperation.
Get email alerts on the Law Enforcement Coordination topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Representative Lee Deming opened House Bill 439, a "sheriff's first" proposal aimed at improving communication between federal law‑enforcement agents and local sheriffs when searches or arrests occur in a county. The sponsor described past incidents (surveillance at gun shows, federal activity without notifying local sheriffs) and said he planned revisions to remove criminal penalties and narrow the bill to a notice requirement.
Supporters included Gary Marbut (Montana Shooting Sports Association) and Sheriff Jesse Slaughter (Cascade County). Slaughter described instances where federal operations occurred in his county without local notice and expressed concern about "blue on blue" encounters. "Notifying us that you're here ... that you're wearing body armor ... doing raids or surveillance is very important," Slaughter said.
Opponents included the Montana Police Protective Association, Montana Association of Chiefs of Police and other law‑enforcement groups, who said the bill as drafted could interfere with cooperative task forces that include federal agents, hinder sensitive undercover operations, and create operational and liability risks. They urged the committee to recast the bill as a notification bill rather than a permission or restriction on federal action.
Committee members asked detailed operational questions about task forces, deputization of local officers, and exceptions when the sheriff is under investigation. Sponsor Deming said forthcoming amendments would limit the bill to notice to the local sheriff or state attorney general without penalties; opponents said they had not yet seen amendment language and reserved judgment.
The committee closed the hearing after extended testimony and Q&A. Sponsor closing remarks emphasized an amended, notification‑only approach.
