Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Hb230 Customer Service And Opa topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee rejects amendment to HB 2 30 and later tables the bill

House Health and Human Services · January 28, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The committee rejected an amendment narrowing House Bill 2 30 to customer-service provisions (9–12) and later voted to table HB 2 30. Debate centered on reopening local offices of public assistance and a $3,000,000 general-fund concern.

The House Health and Human Services committee considered House Bill 2 30 and an amendment (HB 2 30.001) that would preserve customer-service provisions and invest in reopening local offices of public assistance (OPAs) in rural communities.

Vice Chair Hill moved the amendment, saying it narrowed the bill to "improved customer service" measures and reopening select OPAs, particularly in communities without an OPA since 2017. Committee members discussed the proposal's scope, including reopening offices in Cut Bank, Red Lodge and Lewistown, and cited testimony from the mayor of Cut Bank.

Representative Schumer said on the record that the bill would add an "extra $3,000,000 burden to the general fund" and opposed the amendment; other members noted a potential federal match that would reduce net state cost. Representative Cunningham and Vice Chair Hill described stories of interrupted care and long waits on customer-service lines, calling the customer-service pieces "critically important." Representative Nicole said she supported parts of the customer-service language but voted no on the amendment.

The roll call on the amendment resulted in the amendment failing (the Chair announced 9 yea, 12 nay). After further discussion and a subsequent roll call on the bill, Representative (speaker 6) moved to table House Bill 2 30; the Chair called a non-debatable voice vote and directed that the bill be moved back into the committee file, effectively tabling it.

Next steps: HB 2 30 was tabled and will remain in the committee's files pending future scheduling or revisions.