Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the District Boundaries topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Bill would reimburse districts for isolated pupils; Big Sky/Ennis used as example

House Education · March 26, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

House Bill 846 would create a reconciliation payment for pupils unable to access their resident district (example: Big Sky pupils tied to Ennis taxes). Sponsor and proponents described petition processes, a June 1 deadline for petitions, an estimated reconciliation payment of about $440,000, and an advisory council for affected parents.

Representative Ken Walsh opened testimony on House Bill 846, telling the committee the bill addresses pupils who are unable to access on‑site services in their resident school district and establishes a reconciliation payment process for the district that educates them.

Lance Melton of the Montana School Boards Association, speaking for the Coalition of Advocates for Montana's Public Schools, described the Big Sky–Ennis situation: a small number of Madison County residents who live near Big Sky but whose taxes are collected by Ennis Public Schools. Melton said the bill creates a petition process to the county superintendent to identify isolated pupils and to compute a “reconciliation payment” based on what levies would raise proportionally against the resident district’s taxable value. He gave an order‑of‑magnitude estimate: “That reconciliation payment is about $440,000.”

Melton described objective criteria in the bill: an isolated pupil is one who is enrolled and admitted to a non‑resident district contiguous to the resident district; the bus‑time standard is 60 minutes under normal weather conditions by the shortest passable public route; resident district taxable value thresholds (for example, resident district taxable value in excess of $100 million and at least 2.5 times the recipient district) narrow the scope. The bill includes a petition deadline (no later than June 1) and makes the county superintendent’s initial determination appealable to district court via summary proceedings.

Local stakeholders from Big Sky testified in support. Jackie Haines, economic and strategic development director for the Big Sky Resort Area District, said Big Sky generates significant taxable value and that 26 Madison County students attend Big Sky schools while their parents’ taxes go to Ennis. Jared Moretti, superintendent of Ennis Public Schools, and Dustin Shipman, superintendent of Big Sky School District, also urged support and described the bill as a consensus, practical solution.

Sponsor Walsh said the bill provides flexibility for the receiving district to use reconciliation funds in its flexibility fund for high‑cost needs, tax relief, or other district priorities. The bill also proposes formation of an advisory council of community members from the land‑locked area to provide parent input to the district of attendance.

The committee heard technical details, including territory‑transfer provisions and a reverse reconciliation payment if territory is later transferred between districts. The hearing closed with sponsor and proponents urging committee endorsement.