Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Teacher Retention topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee hears bill to broaden access to beginning-teacher loan assistance
Summary
Lawmakers discussed HB 509, which would preserve priority for impacted schools while allowing unused Quality Educator Loan Assistance funds to serve beginning teachers statewide; informational witnesses described program mechanics and application timing.
Representative Debbo Powers introduced House Bill 509 to the House Education Committee as a way to increase the number of beginning teachers who can benefit from the state’s Quality Educator Loan Assistance Program without raising the program’s annual allocation.
Powers, a former teacher and principal, said the program—first created in 2008, reestablished with funding in 2019 and renewed in 2020—provides repayment assistance for eligible beginning educators. The bill would preserve priority access for teachers in impacted (generally rural or high-poverty) schools and allow remaining funds to be made available to other beginning teachers when priority needs are met.
Proponents including Rob Watson (School Administrators of Montana) and Kim Popham (Montana Federation of Public Employees) supported expanding access to existing funds, citing recruitment and retention challenges and low beginning-teacher pay in Montana. Watson presented survey results showing many districts rely on emergency-authorized teachers (who may not qualify for the program), which he said helps explain low program uptake in some areas.
Informational testimony from Christie Mokstutz of the Office of Public Instruction explained program mechanics: payments are spread across three years ($3,000 in year one, $4,000 in year two, $5,000 in year three) with an optional fourth-year district payment of $5,000. Mokstutz said unspent allocations revert to the original state fund that provided them and that the current application window closes April 15; remaining funds would be assessed after the application period to determine availability for other applicants.
Committee members asked how leftover funds are handled and whether expanding eligibility would require additional appropriation. Mokstutz said funds would not be increased by the bill—the change reallocates unused amounts—and that timing depends on the application period and disbursement process. Representative Powers closed by urging support for a bipartisan measure that aims to use allocated money more effectively to retain educators.
The committee took testimony and questions; no final committee vote was recorded in the transcript excerpt.
