Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Parks And Recreation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Kearney delays Hall Park grant decision; city locks in cheaper playground surfacing bid
Summary
Staff said the National Park Service review likely pushed the Hall Park Land and Water Conservation grant award to October; the board approved a pour-in-place playground surfacing bid locked at about $96,000 and staff plans to propose adding Matt Porter Park playground for about $66,000 at the next aldermen meeting.
City staff updated the working group on multiple park projects and federal grant timing, saying a National Park Service review delay pushed the Hall Park Land and Water Conservation grant award from earlier expectations to as late as October.
"It's passed the state. It's at the National Park Service now," Speaker 7 said, noting the federal reviewers are limited in number and the agency must align awards with its fiscal-year schedule. "They have to let us know because that's their fiscal year in October, so they have to get the funds distributed by then."
Staff told board members the city has about $500,000 already earmarked for park work and that pooled city cash is invested centrally; investment earnings are allocated to funds based on their balances.
On playground surfacing, Speaker 7 said the board has approved a pour-in-place rubberized surface that will replace loose wood-fiber mulch. The project was budgeted at $218,000 but vendors returned much lower bids, and staff reported being "locked in at the $96,000" price for the first park surfacing.
"Eric is coming to the next Board of Aldermen meeting to propose that we also do Matt Porter Park Playground," Speaker 3 said. The staff estimate for that additional playground is about $66,000; the work would proceed only if the Board of Aldermen approves spending the budgeted funds.
Staff emphasized the surfacing chosen meets ADA fall-height requirements and that staff selected the material after inspecting ten-year-old installations in other cities, which staff said required little maintenance. No formal funding reallocation or final aldermanic approval was recorded during this working session.
