Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the MOE Change topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Administration withdraws PTC rebate‑to‑tax‑credit proposal; JBC considers $1M MOE implementation appropriation
Summary
Staff told the Joint Budget Committee the administration withdrew a proposed conversion of PTC rebates to a tax credit because of implementation and fiscal complexities, and recommended a roughly $1.0 million appropriation to implement a maintenance‑of‑effort methodology change for Aid to the Needy Disabled.
Tom Dermody, JBC staff, told the committee that the administration withdrew a bill that would have converted PTC rebates into a tax credit after staff and agencies identified implementation complexities and large variance in revenue estimates. "They're effectively pulling that request for that legislation," Dermody said.
As an alternative, staff recommended appropriations to support the Department of Human Services’ move to a payment‑level methodology for maintenance‑of‑effort (MOE) calculations in Aid to the Needy Disabled programs. Dermody said the implementation request totals roughly $1,000,000 in 2526 (about $835,000 general fund) to support the methodology change, with annualization increasing the impact in the following fiscal year.
Members discussed the tradeoffs. Craig Harper described interactions between this withdrawal and balancing assumptions: converting rebates to a tax credit had been counted as a savings in the budget package and withdrawing it increases net appropriations by around $1.0–3.0 million when other interactions are counted. Senator Kirk Meyer and Representative Taggart questioned whether delaying the methodology change for one year could avoid near‑term hits and still yield long‑term benefits. Dermody and other staff said the payment‑level approach reduces MOE volatility over multiple years but produces upfront costs.
The committee accepted staff’s recommendation to consider an appropriation for implementation but declined to grant broad technical adjustment authority; members left final decisions to later figure‑setting once other packet items were resolved.
Authority referenced in the discussion included a change in counting methods tied to federal Title 16 definitions for certain program payments and interactions with federal MOE requirements.
No final binding vote was recorded; staff was asked to model interactions between this item and other long‑bill adjustments for members before final conference decisions.
