Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Pension Investments topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Jacksonville Beach pension fund posts strong returns; consultants flag equity overweight
Summary
The Jacksonville Beach pension plan returned double-digit gains for the quarter and year, but the investment consultant said equities are overweight the policy target and recommended the board consider a rebalance; trustees agreed to monitor performance and address reallocation at the May meeting.
The Jacksonville Beach Pension Board heard on a virtual briefing that the plan produced strong recent returns but is now overweight equities, prompting discussion about a possible rebalancing.
The board—s investment consultant summarized year-end performance, saying the plan returned about 10.36% for the most recent quarter (beating a 9.25% benchmark) and more than 16% for the 12-month period. The consultant attributed the recovery to Federal Reserve support and improving vaccine news, and noted international markets were up roughly 16% in the quarter while the S&P 500 rose about 12%.
The consultant highlighted that the plan—s asset value had risen to about $111,000,000 compared with an assumed-return reference line of about $92,000,000 and that continued gains since year-end brought plan assets to roughly $115,100,000 as of the morning of the briefing. That performance left the plan about 4.7% overweight to domestic equity and about 1.9% overweight to international equity relative to policy targets.
—Given the equity overweight and recent positive returns, a rebalance would bring allocations back within policy ranges,— the consultant said, adding that typical cash flows (benefit payments and a planned drawdown) would partially offset the overweight.
Board members discussed recent cash flows, including a referenced large payout of roughly $400,000 and a drawdown need the consultant described as about $600,000, and agreed not to take immediate action at the briefing. Instead, the board directed staff to monitor performance and to place a rebalance discussion on the agenda for the full meeting on May 11; they also left open the option of convening a smaller special meeting of trustees if market moves or cash-flow needs make action necessary sooner.
Administrator comments during the briefing stressed that formal approvals (minutes and the investment report) will take place at the May meeting; no formal motion or vote on rebalancing occurred during the briefing.
The board will revisit allocation options and any recommended trades at the May meeting, when staff will present formal rebalancing proposals if needed.
