Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Grants Accountability topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board debates missing grants and accountability for county grant submissions
Summary
Supervisors and department heads debated whether Claiborne County missed several grants (some estimated up to roughly $500,000), with disagreement about who was responsible for supplying financial documentation; the county administrator said he would request documentation from outside grant partners and said he has formed a grant‑writing committee.
A contentious discussion about missed grant opportunities dominated the Claiborne County Board meeting July 21 as supervisors, the fire chief and the county administrator traded accounts of where the process broke down.
Fire Chief Schaefer told the board that the fire department missed a Southwest Planning grant opportunity (described in the meeting as roughly $50,000) because requested financial records were not provided in time. Chief Schaefer said he had been working with Lynette Smith at Southwest Planning and that required financial documentation had not arrived before the deadline.
Several supervisors then raised a broader concern, claiming the county lost multiple grants over recent months and estimating that missed awards could total several hundred thousand dollars. Doctor Reed, the county administrator, said he had not received direct requests for some of the grants mentioned and that, when he had been asked for assistance, he responded and attempted to locate documents. Reed said he has since formed a grant‑writing committee and offered to request records from outside partners (including Lynette Smith and others) to clarify what happened and where responsibility lay.
The board asked county legal counsel to request documentation and timelines from the outside grant partners cited in the discussion so the board could establish facts and avoid mistaken finger‑pointing. Several supervisors urged better internal communication and documentation of grant responsibilities going forward; one supervisor emphasized that once a grant is applied for, administration and financial documentation must be tracked to ensure compliance and avoid rescission of funds.
Separately, board members discussed state‑allocated ‘state aid’ projects (road and bridge work) and reminded department heads that certain state aid and ARPA timelines require projects to be under contract by fixed deadlines to preserve the funds. County staff said they would work to ensure projects are advertised and bids awarded in time to meet those deadlines.
President Jones said she will ask Attorney Stingley to request documentation from the external grant partners to produce a clear record of where the process broke down for each grant instance mentioned. The goal, she said, is to identify procedural fixes so the county does not continue to miss funding opportunities.
