Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Noise topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Reno council weighs stricter noise rules after Halloween concert rattled neighborhoods
Summary
Residents described deep bass that shook homes after an outdoor EDM show at the Jay Resort; staff presented 48-hour C-scale noise monitoring and a menu of options — from weather-triggered limits to dedicated night enforcement — and council asked for more study before any ordinance.
Residents filled the council meeting with accounts of late-night bass shaking homes after an Oct. 31 concert at the Jay Resorts Festival Grounds, pressing the Reno City Council to explore new noise rules.
“Dozens, probably hundreds, maybe thousands of your neighbors and mine have been adversely affected,” said Barry Breslow during public comment, describing deep low-frequency noise that moved miles across West Reno. Promoter Chris Sewell of JMF Presents said the Halloween show was run within the conditional use permit and blamed an atmospheric inversion and lack of wind for unusually long sound travel: “Based on the feedback on the Halloween show…we responded immediately” and adjusted speaker deployment for subsequent nights.
On Nov. 19 city staff walked council through how Reno currently enforces noise: residential zoning rules use an A-weighted decibel standard, but downtown has no residential zoning and therefore lacks the same numeric limits. Assistant Director Angela Foos said the city now has 48-hour sound meters deployed around the entertainment core and reviewed sample monitoring charts from Midtown, 2nd/4th streets and the Festival Grounds, noting one Halloween concert peaked around 110 dB. “There’s a lot of misinformation out there on social media,” Foos told council and described the difference between A- and C-weighted measures (the latter better captures the bass that residents reported).
Councilmembers pressed staff on practical enforcement and costs. Several members raised the option of permit conditions linked to weather forecasts — lowering allowable output on predicted inversion days — and asked whether the city could staff night-time monitoring. Foos said stricter enforcement programs in other cities usually require dedicated night teams and “full teams that all they do is noise,” and noted that existing code sections (Titles 5, 6 and 8) are unevenly enforceable without numeric thresholds.
Council did not adopt a new ordinance at the meeting. Instead, members asked staff to refine options and return with more analysis, including further monitoring and possible pilot measures to give the city an enforceable baseline before imposing new limits.
