Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Land Use Code Reorganization topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Planning commission forwards Chapter 16 reorganization (PC 2025‑09R) — clarifications not criteria changes

Severance Planning Commission
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The commission voted to recommend text amendments (PC 2025‑09R) that reorganize and clarify Chapter 16 (design standards, oil & gas, solar and flood provisions). Staff said the updates mostly relocate language and improve clarity; an intergovernmental agreement with Weld County will shift oil & gas technical reviews to the county.

The Planning Commission on June 18 voted to forward resolution PC 2025‑09R — a reorganization and clean‑up of Chapter 16 of the Severance Municipal Code — to Town Council with a recommendation of approval.

Planner Josh O'Halla told commissioners the final sections being considered (design standards, architecture/standards, wireless/oil & gas/solar, and flood damage prevention) do not change substantive criteria but rearrange and clarify existing language so the code is easier for staff, commissioners and the public to use. “All that text existed today. It's just shifted up or moved into a different location,” O'Halla said as he reviewed the redline changes.

Key points: staff emphasized the changes focus on formatting, clearer lead‑in intent language and splitting large tables into more readable pieces; no new design standards or criteria were introduced in these sections. For oil and gas, staff told the commission that the town has entered into an intergovernmental agreement with Weld County: the county’s oil and gas division will perform technical reviews, ensuring state statutory criteria are met while the town processes special‑use reviews.

Commissioners asked for clarification on lighting, setbacks from plugged and abandoned wells, and how certain distances align with state statute. Staff noted some distances are set by state statute while others are administered locally and that the town does maintain setbacks (staff referenced 100–150 feet depending on the standard). The flood damage prevention section involved mainly definition cleanups; staff pointed out a certified floodplain manager reviewed the language.

Decision and next steps: The commission approved PC 2025‑09R by roll call and staff said the sections will be packaged into a single ordinance for Town Council consideration; staff planned to deliver the combined packet to Council in July with an ordinance hearing in August.

Quote: “We have entered into an intergovernmental agreement with [Weld County] to utilize their expertise in oil and gas,” staff said, noting the county will perform an additional technical review layer. O'Halla summarized the code edits as readability and organization improvements rather than substantive regulatory changes.

Context: Commissioners and staff stressed that anyone reviewing the redlines should not expect new criteria; instead the changes are intended to make the code more navigable and to correct inconsistent capitalization and table structure across the chapter.

What to watch for: the full ordinance package will go before Town Council; if Council adopts the ordinance, the reorganized Chapter 16 will replace current language and guide future land‑use reviews.