Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Tourism And Recreation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission approves two Utah Lake waterfront projects with TRCC funding; Vineyard and Saratoga Springs receive county support
Summary
The commission authorized county agreements to match local funds for two Utah Lake waterfront projects: a Saratoga Springs swim/beach addition and a larger Vineyard waterfront/transit-oriented development. Saratoga’s county match was set at $746,746.35; Vineyard’s project was approved unanimously.
The Utah County Commission on Sept. 29 approved county participation in two waterfront improvement projects on Utah Lake recommended by the Tourism, Recreation, Culture and Convention (TRCC) advisory board.
Saratoga Springs city manager Mark Christiansen described plans to add a second jetty at the city marina to create a beach and swim area and broader shoreline amenities. Commissioners discussed historical TAB funding practices — one commissioner said TAB typically contributed about 35 percent of local matching requirements and voiced concern over a suggested 50 percent match. After negotiation and clarifying that cities had identified local and developer matching dollars, a motion was made to approve a county match for the Saratoga Springs Marina Beach TRCC project in the amount of $746,746.35. The motion carried with a 2–0 tally; one member was recorded as abstaining due to technical difficulties.
Vineyard Mayor Julie Fulmer and city manager Jacob McCarga presented a larger, phased waterfront and transit-oriented development that includes promenades, bioswales for stormwater management, connections to a FrontRunner station, a large park and trail improvements. Fulmer and McCarga reported substantial local and developer matches: a combined pledged match of about $24,940,000 (city contribution $17,000,000; developer $8,000,000) across projects described as south, north and east segments and trail work. Commissioners said the project ranked highly with the TRCC board and voted to authorize county sign-off and participation; that motion passed 3–0.
Commissioners and staff noted that approvals were contingent on the cities’ ability to assemble required local match dollars and on final contract terms. Several commissioners asked staff to confirm two-year spending and reporting requirements in contract language; county staff confirmed that the most recent document included the two-year expenditure/reporting language in both required locations.
Both projects were described by the county as investments in outdoor recreation and regional tourism that could increase local visitation and long-term TRCC revenues if the waterfront developments attract additional tourism and amenities.
