Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Health Mask Order topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Utah County Commission ratifies temporary countywide mask requirement after heated public comment
Summary
After hours of debate and a lengthy public-comment period, the Utah County Commission ratified a temporary health order requiring masks where social distancing is not possible. The measure passed 2–1; commissioners said the order will be tracked against state metrics and expires Oct. 20 unless lifted earlier.
Get email alerts on the Public Health Mask Order topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Utah County Commission on Sept. 29 voted 2–1 to ratify a temporary public-health order requiring face coverings when social distancing is not possible, citing a surge in case growth and state guidance that had placed Provo and Orem into an elevated “Orange” risk level.
Chair Tanner Ames said the action followed discussions with the state task force, local mayors and health officials and was intended to avoid stricter statewide restrictions. “Timing was of the essence,” he said in opening remarks, adding the county would monitor data and could lift the order earlier if conditions improve. The order is set to expire Oct. 20 unless rescinded sooner.
The county health director, Ralph Clegg, told commissioners masks reduce viral spread and that the health department would continue to consult state benchmarks. “Masks have been shown to be effective in slowing the spread,” Clegg said.
Opponents, including Commissioner Lee, criticized how the mask requirement was put into effect. Lee said the use of a ratification process — which places a preexisting administrative action on the agenda for later approval — felt rushed and excluded fuller deliberation: “Ratification is a lower form of governance… I will be voting no on the ratification,” he said. Lee cast the lone dissenting vote.
Public comment on the order ran more than an hour. Dozens of residents dialed in or attended in person; many urged the commission either to rescind the order or to set firmer criteria for lifting it. “Our little kids need those off their faces,” said Stephanie Grant, a parent who told commissioners she was worried about children’s emotional development. Other callers pressed for clearer, measurable exit triggers tied to hospitalizations, positivity rates or case counts.
Commissioners acknowledged the requests for clearer criteria. Chair Ames said the county will work with the state task force and the Utah County Health Department to develop more detailed, county-level metrics and ZIP-code data for future decisions. Clegg also agreed to seek more granular testing and hospitalization data from state partners.
The ratified order applies countywide and includes exceptions described in the order text; commissioners and staff emphasized it does not change school mask policy set by the state school board. The commission said it will review the local data repeatedly and is prepared to lift the order if the indicators move in a favorable direction.
The vote was 2 in favor, 1 opposed (Commissioner Lee).
