Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Economic Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners split over continuing economic-development contract; contractor cites past wins and city buy‑in
Summary
Todd Brightwell, economic-development contractor, proposed a transition plan that would stretch current county funds through 2020 and pivot to a city‑supported entity; commissioners raised budget concerns and questioned whether the county needs a dedicated consultant to attract projects.
Get email alerts on the Economic Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Todd Brightwell, an economic-development contractor working with Utah County, presented a proposal to continue county economic-development representation through a restructured program that would be primarily supported by cities and defer additional county funding until 2021. Brightwell cited past successes, including the Tyson Foods project, and said two other projects with estimated capital expenditures in the hundreds of millions of dollars were in active consideration.
Commissioners questioned the necessity and affordability of continuing a contract in a year when county budgets were constrained. One commissioner said bluntly, “I view it as not essential as we deal with our budget challenges,” and indicated reluctance to support further county contract funding. Other commissioners noted that without active representation, the county might miss opportunities and lose competitive advantage for major projects.
Brightwell said cities had shown initial interest in supporting a new regional program and that the proposed structure could leverage city funding to reduce county burden; he also said not every project requires incentives and that some large projects locating to the county required representation. No contract award or budget decision was made at the work session; commissioners indicated the item will return for further consideration as part of budget and policy discussions.
