Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Pension Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Utah County Commissioners approve local pickup option for Senate Bill 56 URS Tier 2 public‑safety benefit
Summary
The commission adopted a resolution to implement options under Senate Bill 56 that raise Tier 2 public‑safety retirement multipliers; staff estimated the county share at roughly $99,000 annually and said counties may either pay the increase or require employee contributions.
The Utah County Commission voted to adopt a resolution implementing local options related to Senate Bill 56, which raises the retirement‑multiplier used to calculate benefits for Tier 2 public‑safety employees. Ralph Marrs of county Human Resources told commissioners the legislative change increases the multiplier from 1.5 to 2 and enhances death benefits; the state will absorb costs for state employees while the incremental cost for county employees falls on local governments unless turned into an employee contribution. Marrs said the county’s portion equates to roughly $99,000 a year in increased costs.
Commission members questioned whether boosting retirement benefits — rather than increasing wages — is the most effective way to recruit and retain officers. “When somebody’s first getting into it, that wage is the attractor,” the meeting chair (name not stated in the transcript) said, stressing total compensation considerations. Sheriff Smith urged support for the pickup, arguing counties compete with surrounding jurisdictions and private employers and that parity in retirement benefits helps retain officers: “When you have different entities… 28 of the 29 counties say, we’re gonna do this… that’s when that shopping starts to occur,” he said.
Marrs explained an alternative: the county may require a modest employee contribution (about 2.27 percent of the increase) but warned of tax implications for employees if the cost is shifted. He also said if the county pays the increase, it is treated as a non‑taxable employer pickup. Commissioners discussed market comparisons and the tradeoffs between cash compensation and benefit enhancements; Marrs and Sheriff Smith said most counties are adopting the pickup, which supports comparable total compensation in regional labor markets.
After discussion, a commissioner moved to adopt the resolution as posted on the agenda. The motion was seconded and passed unanimously 3–0.
The commission’s action implements the local option created by the legislature but does not yet finalize whether the county will absorb the cost long term, modify wages, or require employee contributions; commissioners said they expect follow‑up budget and human‑resources analyses to determine the most sustainable approach.
