Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Board Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Utah County commissioners approve Siemens drug-testing contract, select RBC for bond underwriting and vote on leadership changes
Summary
The Utah County Commission approved Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics for urine drug screening services, authorized further negotiation with RBC for underwriting on a convention center bond refunding and voted on multiple agenda adjustments and a contested chair/vice-chair election.
The Utah County Commission on Monday approved a series of routine and contested actions, including awarding a laboratory-services contract, selecting a recommended underwriter for a bond refunding and voting on leadership changes.
The commission accepted the purchasing committee's recommendation to recognize Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics as the awardee for the county's urine drug screening laboratory services RFP. Purchasing staff reported two proposals — from Siemens and Thermo Fisher — and the committee ranked Siemens first. A motion to approve consent agenda item No. 13 and to recognize Siemens was made on the record and passed by voice vote (motion recorded at SEG 110'SEG 119). No dollar amount for the contract was specified in the public discussion.
Separately, the commission received a recommendation from Matt Dugdale of Stifel Nicolaus on underwriting services connected with an excise tax refunding for convention center bonds. Dugdale said three firms responded (JPMorgan, Royal Bank of Canada/RBC and Piper Jaffray) and that RBC received the highest score; the commission moved to enter further negotiations with RBC and the motion passed 3-0 (recommendation and vote referenced at SEG 128'SEG 179). Dugdale said the scoring included both qualitative and quantitative measures and that RBC was the highest-ranked firm.
Commissioners also carried several procedural motions: they voted to strike two regular-agenda items (8 and 9) and approved setting closed sessions for agenda items 6 and 7 to occur following the meeting (motions passed by voice vote, SEG 411'SEG 429). The commission later returned from closed session and adjourned the meeting (SEG 1662'SEG 1669).
On the election of board leadership, commissioners debated replacing the chair and vice chair. The item prompted a heated exchange about communications, town-hall notices and use of the county's Qualtrics/press-release processes. A motion to elect new leadership was put and passed by recorded voice; the tally was reported as two in favor and one opposed (SEG 182'SEG 406). The record shows disagreement about the content and tone of public communications during a recent budget process and town halls, including claims that some public messaging misrepresented the positions of other commissioners.
What happens next: procurement approvals will move forward as approved; staff said they will proceed to negotiate with RBC as recommended. The commission also directed staff to hold the referenced closed sessions immediately after the meeting.
