Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Water Quality Source Protection topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
County adopts new source‑protection rules with narrow exception for pre‑2010 lots
Summary
After public comment and debate, the Utah County Commission adopted version 2 of an ordinance amending County Code chapter 10‑8 to require contaminant‑reducing on‑site wastewater systems in source protection zones while allowing exceptions for pre‑2010 platted lots that meet hydrologic study criteria.
Get email alerts on the Water Quality Source Protection topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Utah County Commission adopted an amendment to chapter 10‑8 of the Utah County Code aimed at tightening protections for drinking‑water source zones while creating a limited, study‑based path for a small set of pre‑2010 platted lots.
The ordinance replaces a narrow reference to a specific technology with broader language requiring a “contaminant‑reducing alternative on‑site wastewater system” in high‑risk zones, and it allows a conventional system only where an approved hydrogeologic/septic density study shows nitrate levels meet current U.S. Environmental Protection Agency goals and affected downstream users sign off.
Covered Bridge Canyon residents and water users sought clearer drafting. Jill Taylor, secretary of the Covered Bridge Canyon Property Owners Association, said the paragraph’s structure made it hard to determine whether conventional systems could be used and urged rewording so the general rule and exception are explicit. Taylor told commissioners she favored flipping the clause so the rule and then the exception read plainly.
County staff and legal counsel explained that version 2 implements the county’s intent: an alternative system should be required in most instances, and conventional systems are available only when professional hydrologic analysis and downstream approvals demonstrate no risk. County staff noted the ordinance was written to protect downstream users and to provide an affirmative defense to the county if a licensed geotechnical or hydrological professional had approved a conventional system.
Commissioner Lee said he preferred the countywide version that continues to require heightened protection in Zone 2, while another commissioner supported a narrowly tailored exception for pre‑2010 lots that had existing property interests. After extended debate about precedent, downstream‑user signoffs and legal defensibility, the commission voted 3‑0 to adopt version 2 of the ordinance.
What this changes: the county’s approach now prioritizes contaminant‑reducing wastewater technology in source protection zones, gives staff and applicants a clear study path for limited exceptions, and requires professional certification and downstream user acknowledgement when conventional systems are allowed.
Next steps: staff will publish the adopted ordinance and update permitting guidance. Residents in affected platted areas will need to pursue the hydrogeologic and septic‑density studies described in the ordinance if they wish to pursue conventional systems under the exception.
