Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Land Use Rezone topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commission continues 16,400-acre West Lake Mountain rezone after public comment

Utah County Board of County Commissioners · October 16, 2018
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Saratoga Springs’ request to rezone roughly 16,400 acres on West Lake Mountain was discussed Oct. 16; state and private stakeholders urged careful parcel-by-parcel consideration and planning commission recommended denial. The commission continued the item to Nov. 6 for more review.

The Utah County Board of County Commissioners on Oct. 16 heard a detailed presentation on a Saratoga Springs application to rezone approximately 16,400 acres on West Lake Mountain from mining-and-grazing to the county’s new G-1 grazing zone, then continued the matter to Nov. 6 to allow time to review additional letters and parcel exhibits.

Bryce Armstrong, community development staff, summarized the application and supporting materials, saying the proposal covers a mix of federal, state and private parcels and that planning commissioners recommended denial as overreaching. Armstrong noted letters from the Bureau of Land Management and SITLA and said he had received a late SITLA letter that appeared to modify SITLA's earlier opposition.

Tom Faddis of SITLA addressed the commission during public comment and urged caution. “We’re not opposed to rezoning,” Faddis said, but asked the county to consider amendments to exclude active mineral-right parcels and to work with lessees who have invested in infrastructure. Private lessee Dustin Huichley described a gravel-operation plan on leased land and urged exclusions for certain parcels, saying development economics make some parcels unsuitable for residential subdivision but necessary for resource operations.

Commissioners said the application raises complex questions that need more time to digest given the new SITLA letter, the planning commission's recommendation, and multiple private-ownership concerns. The board voted to continue the item to Nov. 6 to allow staff and stakeholders to negotiate parcel-level adjustments and provide additional documentation before any vote.

Next steps: staff will circulate the late SITLA letter and parcel exhibits to commissioners and stakeholders, and the commission will revisit the rezone application on Nov. 6.