Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Personnel topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
County authorizes phased implementation of compensation study; back-pay review set for September
Summary
After extended debate on costs, job-audit coverage and retroactive pay, commissioners authorized implementation of the compensation-study committee's recommendations effective pay period 15 and directed staff to finalize a small set of position adjustments and to review back-pay feasibility with a decision by Sept. 30; the motion carried 3-0.
The Utah County Board of County Commissioners authorized phased implementation of a compensation-study committee recommendation to realign pay ranges to market benchmarks, while reserving additional work on retroactive pay and several identified position adjustments.
HR Director Lena Jensen summarized the committee'led market study review and presented an implementation cost estimate: "the overall cost to implement beginning pay period 15 was just over $1,000,000 for the general fund and under $1,000,000 for the other funds," she said. Commissioners praised the staff work but raised questions about sample size, spot audits, job-description comparability, and where the funding would come from for full implementation and any retroactive payments.
Commissioner Lee and others noted the exercise of spot-checking roughly 50 positions (a sample of the county's roughly 355 positions) and asked for additional position-level review and corrections before full implementation. Several speakers, including Sheriff Fracie, asked that employees see their individualized results so they can provide informed feedback; the sheriff noted many employees had not yet seen position-level details.
After extended discussion, the commission approved an amended motion to implement the committee'recommended adjustments effective pay period 15, directed staff to finalize and release a short list of position corrections to employees by Friday (close of business), and required a review of retroactive/back-pay options with a final decision by Sept. 30. The motion carried 3-0.
