Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Personal Property Tax topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Utah County Commission approves appeal of 2014 motorhome tax assessment

Utah County Commission · April 25, 2017
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Utah County Commission approved an appeal of the 2016–2017 personal property tax assessment for a 2014 motorhome owned by Marvin G. Hoke, voting 2–0 to lower the assessed value after staff said the NADA book appeared too high compared with sale evidence.

The Utah County Commission voted 2–0 on a public appeal to lower the assessed value of a 2014 motorhome owned by Marvin G. Hoke, approving the appeal as stated in the motion recorded at $124,850.

County staff member Peter Jeppesen told the commission the motorhome was purchased in February 2014 in an arm’s-length transaction for $159,600. Jeppesen said there were few comparable sales and that the NADA valuation used by DMV and county staff appeared too high. Paulette, a county staff member involved in records, said there was no account for the vehicle in VADERS (the DMV system), so staff relied on the NADA book, which produced a figure of $205,470 used in calculating taxes.

The commission discussed the discrepancy between the NADA-derived figure and the purchase price. Jeppesen recommended adjusting the assessment closer to the amount the appellant requested, saying, “I don’t think that they’re out of line at a 124,000,” and noting depreciation since 2014. An unidentified commissioner moved to “approve and recognize the appeal as stated for the hundred and 24850,” the Chair seconded after suspending the rules, and the motion passed by voice vote with Commissioner Ivy and Commissioner Lee recorded as the two yes votes.

The meeting record shows staff presented the valuation sources (VADERS and the NADA book) and that the commission’s action was a formal approval of the appeal, lowering the county assessment to the figure recorded in the motion. No further debate or conditions were recorded. The meeting adjourned immediately after the vote.

What’s next: The commission’s approval is reflected in the meeting record; any change to the taxpayer’s account or county tax bill will follow the county’s standard processing and billing procedures.